This is completely my own set of theories - I didn't source my conclusions from anyone else.

The more of the many videos I get in my feed (just the titles and thumbnails, there are too many videos on the subject to even begin to follow) the more it appears that there were a multitude of security oversights, breaches of protocol, lack of enforcement of a supposed secure area, ignoring of eyewitnesses and even police who were speaking up about the sniper. A woman was riding a horse around the grounds holding a MAGA flag - she got in - secret service doesn't encourage equestrians.

It wasn't one or two procedural mistakes was made and "shit happens".

It was literally a confluence of many, many alibis that prevented the gunman from being timely stopped. Plus Alejandro Majorkas and Homeland Security that denied requests for additional secret service for Trump's campaign.

Plus the cops did what just what they do in such a situation - they killed the guy so he couldn't be interrogated - just like Lee Harvey Oswald.

From most of this I honestly believe that it was an inside job.

Also let us consider coordination.

That kid had no means to finance his equipment and training and the parents were completely unaware.

And his social media was all scrubbed instantly. PBD podcast mentioned that day (can't find the reference) that Google searches were completed on the shooter's full name the very morning of the shooting, 12 hours before the shooting. This too specific to be coincidence.

The shooter's preparation demanded resources and planning. He was a young kid who lived in his parent's basement. He was nevertheless an excellent shot and almost killed Trump from 100+ yards. I'm no a gun person but that doesn't sound like a kid who just woke up and decided to shoot Trump one day.

Someone mentored, groomed and encouraged him. I assume 100% that he had received funding, encouragement, training, technical support, and equipment from some group. He was too prepared, too good, too effective. I couldn't even buy a 6 pack of beer competently at that age without looking like a complete klutz. He had help.

Lastly, I think this shooter was essentially a "sleeper" agent, someone recruited from the general population. The Trump campaign announces rally stops a day or so before the event. I believe that the shooter was planted by some group as an asset to be activated when he was needed. He lived 50 miles away from the rally. I would therefore assume that there are other such individuals "cached" in locations similar to this, where they may be campaign stops in locations where law enforcement and physical barriers can be manipulated.

The 2020 election established beyond a shadow of doubt that our deep state will do anything they want to create an outcome. This is no different.

That's my "Occam's Razor" analysis.

Lots of people are saying it's an inside job. I tend to agree.

Someone intentionally made sure that building roof was unsecured. They will claim incompetence.

The shooter knew exactly where the security breach was and where to take his shot. Someone told him where to go.

It's abnormal nowadays for a 20 year old to have zero social media. Someone scrubbed it before the event.

The "explosives in the car" makes no sense. His handlers probably told him that he could take a shot at the President and somehow get away.

There also are videos of Trump supporters shouting "Hey! There's a guy on the roof with a gun!" minutes before it happened. That makes it sound like someone was ordered to stand down.

Killing the shooter can go both ways. He still was an active shooter, which justifies taking him out. However, it means he can't be interrogated.

The order to kill the shooter was probably given BEFORE they realized he missed. I heard reports that a sniper identified the person on the roof, but was ordered to hold his fire.

My prediction: Nobody will admit it was an inside job. A few people will get fired for incompetence.

The good news is that security will be 10x more from now on. They had their shot and missed it. They probably won't get another one.

Good, you got exactly what I was saying and you reached the same conclusions. I mean, NOT good exactly, but I want an accurate model of what is going on.

I want to refer to one point above - the Google searches for his name the morning of. If someone owns social media accounts they know what the user names and URLs are. If someone else Googled his name it was likely a "support staff" that was searching for his presence online and then seeing to it that every trace was removed. There is probably someone at X, Meta, Google, etc that knows that they were asked to do this specific removal that morning.

That's my life experience of politics.

Something bad for the public happens (but good for a given vested interest) and incompetence is blamed. Maybe someone head rolls or maybe it doesn't, much moreso in the old days than these days. On to the next thing.

Same pattern again and again and again. No-one ever tries to permanently fix the incompetence, just quick fixes that do little.

I suspect this shooting was allowed/helped to happen.

Incompetence should never be accepted as an excuse, especially in a professional context where they should know better.

If someone injures me on purpose, or injures me due to incompetence, the net effect is the same. I am injured.

It's the same as "insanity defense" as an excuse for putting violent criminals back on the street. If they're so crazy that they don't know what they're doing, they belong in prison or a secure mental hospital.

It was a definite inside job. I can't believe the SS didn't secure the rooftop of that building. They identified it as a problem but didn't secure it because it was outside the perimeter. Instead they relied on local law enforcement that supposedly confronted the shooter on the roof but backed away when he pointed the gun at him. I haven't heard much about the local law enforcement response, but I think the building should have been secured by the SS.

Trump didn't have his usual SS team of agents because on that day both Kamala and Jill Biden had rallies in PA. More agents were sent to Jill's rally and Trump received some temporary agents. That seems like an odd choice. How many people could have been at her rally compared to a Trump rally?

It looks more and more like a government-coordinated assassination operation to me.

Trump didn't have his usual SS team of agents because on that day both Kamala and Jill Biden had rallies in PA. More agents were sent to Jill's rally and Trump received some temporary agents. That seems like an odd choice. How many people could have been at her rally compared to a Trump rally?

9-11 all over again. Resources coincidentally deployed elsewhere, creating a temporary vulnerability in the regular security setup.

The problem is not just "resources deployed elsewhere". Someone had to communicate to the shooter that this was a good day for an assassination, and what rooftop was vulnerable. No way a 20 year old figures that out on his own.

If the shooter didn't have help, he would have been caught right away. "Man with gun arrested at Trump rally" wouldn't even be a headline.

no argument with any of that

I hope this becomes an inquiry under Trump and there are some treason charges.

This makes sense. Someone posted it in the comments section on Breitbart.

HealthRanger

@HealthRanger

There is now a very credible explanation emerging that says US Secret Service agents, on orders from Kimberly Cheatle and Alejandro Mayorkas, placed a Secret Service team INSIDE the building where the "shooter" was crawling on the roof, and that the actual shots targeting #Trump may have been taken by the US Secret Service from INSIDE the building. This would be consistent with the audio forensics of the shooting recordings, since the distance would be nearly identical to the rooftop "shooter." This also explains why counter-sniper teams held their fire until AFTER the "shooter" killed Trump. Their job was to eliminate the patsy. Note that US Secret Service had eyes on this young man for at least 30 minutes, watching him with an actual rangefinder, scoping the range of the shot, then with a backpack, then scaling the ladder and going onto the roof. They watched him and reported on his progress. They did nothing to stop him. They did everything but load his rifle and pull the trigger. We need an immediate criminal investigation into Kimberly Cheatle and a hard look at all US Secret Service counter-snipers deployed that day. This stinks to high Heaven. Note that in the assassination of JFK, they also had a patsy, while the real shot was taken by a CIA-run sharpshooter. Cheatle's bizarre "sloped roof" excuse doesn't pass the smell test. She's covering up something.

There is zero chance anyone will every publicly admit that it was an inside job.

Someone knew that building was unsecured and told him to stand there.

The whole thing stinks. Nobody is really that incompetent.

This is a standard trick evil people use. They say "I'm incompetent" as a get out of jail free card. It's much easier to admit incompetence than to prove someone did it on purpose.